Advertisement

Technological Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgical Oncology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Heald R.J.
        • Husband E.M.
        • Ryall R.D.
        The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?.
        Br J Surg. 1982; 69: 613-616
        • Hohenberger W.
        • Weber K.
        • Matzel K.
        • et al.
        Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome.
        Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11: 354-364
        • Jacobs M.
        • Verdeja J.C.
        • Goldstein H.S.
        Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).
        Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1: 144-150
        • Fowler D.L.
        • White S.A.
        Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1: 183-188
        • Evans L.
        • Manley K.
        Is there a cosmetic advantage to single-incision laparoscopic surgical techniques over standard laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016; 26: 177-182
        • Athanasiou C.
        • Pitt J.
        • Malik A.
        • et al.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision colectomy for colon cancer.
        Surg Innov. 2020; 27: 235-243
        • Song Z.
        • Li Y.
        • Liu K.
        • et al.
        Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 1117-1123
        • Liu X.
        • Yang W.H.
        • Jiao Z.G.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.
        World J Surg Oncol. 2019; 17: 179
        • Hoyuela C.
        • Juvany M.
        • Carvajal F.
        Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Surg. 2017; 214: 127-140
        • Poon J.T.
        • Cheung C.W.
        • Fan J.K.
        • et al.
        Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2012; 26: 2729-2734
        • Sheetz K.H.
        • Norton E.C.
        • Dimick J.B.
        • et al.
        Perioperative outcomes and trends in the use of robotic colectomy for Medicare beneficiaries from 2010 through 2016.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 41-49
        • Solaini L.
        • Bazzocchi F.
        • Cavaliere D.
        • et al.
        Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 1104-1110
        • Roh H.F.
        • Nam S.H.
        • Kim J.M.
        Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PloS One. 2018; 13: e0191628
        • Huang Y.J.
        • Kang Y.N.
        • Huang Y.M.
        • et al.
        Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Asian J Surg/Asian Surg Assoc. 2019; 42: 657-666
        • Giuliani G.
        • Guerra F.
        • Coletta D.
        • et al.
        Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic technique for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021; 37: 101-109
        • Wolthuis A.M.
        • Fieuws S.
        • Van Den Bosch A.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic colectomy with or without natural-orifice specimen extraction.
        Br J Surg. 2015; 102: 630-637
        • Franklin Jr., M.E.
        • Liang S.
        • Russek K.
        Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 127-132
        • Nishimura A.
        • Kawahara M.
        • Suda K.
        • et al.
        Totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with transanal specimen extraction.
        Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 3459-3463
        • Buess G.
        • Theiss R.
        • Hutterer F.
        • et al.
        [Transanal endoscopic surgery of the rectum - testing a new method in animal experiments].
        Leber Magen Darm. 1983; 13: 73-77
        • Winde G.
        • Nottberg H.
        • Keller R.
        • et al.
        Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 969-976
        • Nieuwenhuis D.H.
        • Draaisma W.A.
        • Verberne G.H.
        • et al.
        Transanal endoscopic operation for rectal lesions using two-dimensional visualization and standard endoscopic instruments: a prospective cohort study and comparison with the literature.
        Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 80-86
        • Atallah S.
        • Albert M.
        • Larach S.
        Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2200-2205
        • Gavagan J.A.
        • Whiteford M.H.
        • Swanstrom L.L.
        Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications.
        Am J Surg. 2004; 187: 630-634
        • Marks J.
        • Mizrahi B.
        • Dalane S.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic transanal abdominal transanal resection with sphincter preservation for rectal cancer in the distal 3 cm of the rectum after neoadjuvant therapy.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2700-2707
        • Rattner D.
        • Kalloo A.
        • Group A.S.W.
        ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. 2005.
        Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 329-333
        • Sylla P.
        • Willingham F.F.
        • Sohn D.K.
        • et al.
        NOTES rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with transgastric endoscopic assistance: a pilot study in swine.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12: 1717-1723
        • Leroy J.
        • Barry B.D.
        • Melani A.
        • et al.
        No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery.
        JAMA Surg. 2013; 148: 226-230
        • Sylla P.
        • Sohn D.K.
        • Cizginer S.
        • et al.
        Survival study of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery with or without transgastric endoscopic assistance in a swine model.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2022-2030
        • Whiteford M.H.
        • Denk P.M.
        • Swanstrom L.L.
        Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 1870-1874
        • Telem D.A.
        • Han K.S.
        • Kim M.C.
        • et al.
        Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 74-80
        • Sylla P.
        • Rattner D.W.
        • Delgado S.
        • et al.
        NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 1205-1210
        • Penna M.
        • Hompes R.
        • Arnold S.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases.
        Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 111-117
        • Penna M.
        • Hompes R.
        • Arnold S.
        • et al.
        Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 700-711
        • Deijen C.L.
        • Velthuis S.
        • Tsai A.
        • et al.
        COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3210-3215
        • Lelong B.
        • Meillat H.
        • Zemmour C.
        • et al.
        Short- and mid-term outcomes after endoscopic transanal or laparoscopic transabdominal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a single institutional case-control study.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224: 917-925
        • Lacy A.M.
        • Garcia-Valdecasas J.C.
        • Delgado S.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2002; 359: 2224-2229
        • Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group
        • Nelson H.
        • Sargent D.J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2050-2059
        • Veldkamp R.
        • Kuhry E.
        • Hop W.C.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 477-484
        • Hewett P.J.
        • Allardyce R.A.
        • Bagshaw P.F.
        • et al.
        Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 728-738
        • Yamamoto S.
        • Inomata M.
        • Katayama H.
        • et al.
        Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 23-30
        • van der Pas M.H.
        • Haglind E.
        • Cuesta M.A.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 210-218
        • Stevenson A.R.
        • Solomon M.J.
        • Lumley J.W.
        • et al.
        Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the AlaCaRT randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1356-1363
        • Fleshman J.
        • Branda M.
        • Sargent D.J.
        • et al.
        Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1346-1355
        • Ng K.T.
        • Tsia A.K.V.
        • Chong V.Y.L.
        Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
        World J Surg. 2019; 43: 1146-1161
        • Lim S.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Baek S.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016; 90: 328-339
        • Simillis C.
        • Lal N.
        • Thoukididou S.N.
        • et al.
        Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic versus transanal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 270: 59-68
        • Jones K.
        • Qassem M.G.
        • Sains P.
        • et al.
        Robotic total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review following the publication of the ROLARR trial.
        World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 10: 449-464
        • Jayne D.
        • Pigazzi A.
        • Marshall H.
        • et al.
        Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2017; 318: 1569-1580
        • Kang S.B.
        • Park J.W.
        • Jeong S.Y.
        • et al.
        Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 637-645
        • Guillou P.J.
        • Quirke P.
        • Thorpe H.
        • et al.
        Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2005; 365: 1718-1726
        • Palanivelu C.
        • Sendhilkumar K.
        • Jani K.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic anterior resection and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective nonrandomized study.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22: 367-372
        • Tjandra J.J.
        • Chan M.K.
        • Yeh C.H.
        Laparoscopic- vs. hand-assisted ultralow anterior resection: a prospective study.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 26-31
        • Selvindos P.B.
        • Ho Y.H.
        Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 1710-1711
        • Fleshman J.
        • Sargent D.J.
        • Green E.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 655-662
        • Jayne D.G.
        • Thorpe H.C.
        • Copeland J.
        • et al.
        Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.
        Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 1638-1645
        • Liao G.
        • Zhao Z.
        • Lin S.
        • et al.
        Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials.
        World J Surg Oncol. 2014; 12: 122
        • Zhang X.
        • Wei Z.
        • Bie M.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 5601-5614
        • Tyler J.A.
        • Fox J.P.
        • Desai M.M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56: 458-466
        • Detering R.
        • Roodbeen S.X.
        • van Oostendorp S.E.
        • et al.
        Three-year nationwide experience with transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in the Netherlands: a propensity score-matched comparison with conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2019; 228: 235-244 e231
        • Braunschmid T.
        • Hartig N.
        • Baumann L.
        • et al.
        Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 5318-5326
        • Quirke P.
        • Steele R.
        • Monson J.
        • et al.
        Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 821-828
        • Rouanet P.
        • Mourregot A.
        • Azar C.C.
        • et al.
        Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56: 408-415
        • Sylla P.
        • Knol J.J.
        • D’Andrea A.P.
        • et al.
        Urethral injury and other urologic injuries during transanal total mesorectal excision: an international collaborative study.
        Ann Surg. 2021; 274: e115-e125
        • Adamina M.
        • Buchs N.C.
        • Penna M.
        • et al.
        Gallen Colorectal Consensus Expert G. St. Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 1091-1103
        • Ratcliffe F.
        • Hogan A.M.
        • Hompes R.
        CO2 embolus: an important complication of TaTME surgery.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21: 61-62
        • Harnsberger C.R.
        • Alavi K.
        • Davids J.S.
        • et al.
        CO2 embolism can complicate transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2018; 22: 881-885
        • Dickson E.A.
        • Penna M.
        • Cunningham C.
        • et al.
        Carbon dioxide embolism associated with transanal total mesorectal excision surgery: a report from the international registries.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2019; 62: 794-801
        • Park J.S.
        • Kang H.
        • Park S.Y.
        • et al.
        Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 2975-2981
        • Jeong S.Y.
        • Park J.W.
        • Nam B.H.
        • et al.
        Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomisedandomized controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 767-774
        • Massarweh N.N.
        • Hu C.Y.
        • You Y.N.
        • et al.
        Risk-adjusted pathologic margin positivity rate as a quality indicator in rectal cancer surgery.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 2967-2974
        • Fleshman J.
        • Branda M.E.
        • Sargent D.J.
        • et al.
        Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 589-595
        • Conticchio M.
        • Papagni V.
        • Notarnicola M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PloS One. 2020; 15: e0235887
        • Knol J.J.
        • D’Hondt M.
        • Souverijns G.
        • et al.
        Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below--a preliminary report.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2015; 19: 221-229
        • Han C.
        • Yan P.
        • Jing W.
        • et al.
        Clinical, pathological, and oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
        Asian J Surg. 2020; 43: 880-890
        • Debakey Y.
        • Zaghloul A.
        • Farag A.
        • et al.
        Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer surgery, first Egyptian academic center experience, RCT.
        Minim Invasive Surg. 2018; 2018: 5836562
        • Baik S.H.
        • Ko Y.T.
        • Kang C.M.
        • et al.
        Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 1601-1608
        • Green B.L.
        • Marshall H.C.
        • Collinson F.
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer.
        Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 75-82
        • Zeng Z.
        • Luo S.
        • Chen J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of pathological outcomes after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a prospective study using data from randomized control trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 3956-3962
        • Ma B.
        • Gao P.
        • Song Y.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
        BMC Cancer. 2016; 16: 380
        • Roodbeen S.X.
        • de Lacy F.B.
        • van Dieren S.
        • et al.
        Predictive factors and risk model for positive circumferential resection margin rate after transanal total mesorectal excision in 2653 patients with rectal cancer.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 270: 884-891
        • D’Andrea A.P.
        • McLemore E.C.
        • Bonaccorso A.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve.
        Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 4101-4109
        • Roodbeen S.X.
        • Penna M.
        • Mackenzie H.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 2459-2467
        • Larsen S.G.
        • Pfeffer F.
        • Korner H.
        • et al.
        Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Br J Surg. 2019; 106: 1120-1121
        • Wasmuth H.H.
        • Faerden A.E.
        • Myklebust T.A.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway.
        Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 121-130
        • van Oostendorp S.E.
        • Belgers H.J.
        • Bootsma B.T.
        • et al.
        Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation.
        Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 1211-1220
        • Hol J.C.
        • van Oostendorp S.E.
        • Tuynman J.B.
        • et al.
        Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23: 903-911
        • Roodbeen S.X.
        • Spinelli A.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        • et al.
        Local recurrence after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.
        Ann Surg. 2021; 274: 359-366
        • Simo V.
        • Tejedor P.
        • Jimenez L.M.
        • et al.
        Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.
        Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 1808-1819
        • Kang D.W.
        • Kwak H.D.
        • Sung N.S.
        • et al.
        Oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer patients with a ≤1-cm distal resection margin.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017; 32: 325-332
        • Moghadamyeghaneh Z.
        • Carmichael J.C.
        • Mills S.
        • et al.
        Variations in laparoscopic colectomy utilization in the United States.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58: 950-956
        • Simons A.J.
        • Anthone G.J.
        • Ortega A.E.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38: 600-603
        • Schlachta C.M.
        • Mamazza J.
        • Seshadri P.A.
        • et al.
        Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 217-222
        • Nasseri Y.
        • Stettler I.
        • Shen W.
        • et al.
        Learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.
        J Robot Surg. 2021; 15: 489-495
        • Shaw D.D.
        • Wright M.
        • Taylor L.
        • et al.
        Robotic colorectal surgery learning curve and case complexity.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018; 28: 1163-1168
        • Atallah S.
        • Albert M.
        The neurovascular bundle of Walsh and other anatomic considerations crucial in preventing urethral injury in males undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20: 411-412
        • Koedam T.W.A.
        • Veltcamp Helbach M.
        • van de Ven P.M.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2018; 22: 279-287
        • Lee L.
        • Kelly J.
        • Nassif G.J.
        • et al.
        Defining the learning curve for transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma.
        Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 1534-1542
        • Francis N.
        • Penna M.
        • Carter F.
        • et al.
        Development and early outcomes of the national training initiative for transanal total mesorectal excision in the UK.
        Colorectal Dis. 2020; 22: 756-767
        • Fearnhead N.S.
        • Acheson A.G.
        • Brown S.R.
        • et al.
        The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Colorectal Dis. 2020; 22: 745-748
        • TaTme Guidance Group representing the Escp icwtAAEEECCCCJSSSS-MIS
        International expert consensus guidance on indications, implementation and quality measures for transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Colorectal Dis. 2020; 22: 749-755
        • Veltcamp Helbach M.
        • van Oostendorp S.E.
        • Koedam T.W.A.
        • et al.
        Structured training pathway and proctoring; multicenter results of the implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in the Netherlands.
        Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 192-201
        • Francis N.
        • Penna M.
        • Mackenzie H.
        • et al.
        Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 2711-2719
        • Kim M.J.
        • Park S.C.
        • Park J.W.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2018; 267: 243-251
        • Grass J.K.
        • Chen C.C.
        • Melling N.
        • et al.
        Robotic rectal resection preserves anorectal function: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Med Robot. 2021; 17: e2329
        • Bolton W.S.
        • Chapman S.J.
        • Corrigan N.
        • et al.
        The incidence of low anterior resection syndrome as assessed in an international randomized controlled trial (MRC/NIHR ROLARR).
        Ann Surg. 2021; 274: e1223-e1229
        • Kim J.Y.
        • Kim N.K.
        • Lee K.Y.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19: 2485-2493
        • D’Annibale A.
        • Pernazza G.
        • Monsellato I.
        • et al.
        Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 1887-1895
        • van der Heijden J.A.G.
        • Koeter T.
        • Smits L.J.H.
        • et al.
        Functional complaints and quality of life after transanal total mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis.
        Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 489-498
        • Veltcamp Helbach M.
        • Koedam T.W.A.
        • Knol J.J.
        • et al.
        Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 79-87
        • Bjoern M.X.
        • Nielsen S.
        • Perdawood S.K.
        Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; 23: 1623-1630
        • Pontallier A.
        • Denost Q.
        • Van Geluwe B.
        • et al.
        Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision.
        Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 4924-4933
        • Foo C.C.
        • Kin Ng K.
        • Tsang J.S.
        • et al.
        Low anterior resection syndrome after transanal total mesorectal excision: a comparison with the conventional top-to-bottom approach.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63: 497-503
        • Leao P.
        • Santos C.
        • Goulart A.
        • et al.
        TaTME: analysis of the evacuatory outcomes and EUS anal sphincter.
        Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019; 28: 332-337
        • Keller D.S.
        • Reali C.
        • Spinelli A.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported functional and quality-of-life outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision.
        Br J Surg. 2019; 106: 364-366
        • Rahman R.
        • Wood M.E.
        • Qian L.
        • et al.
        Head-mounted display use in surgery: a systematic review.
        Surg Innov. 2020; 27: 88-100
        • Erridge S.
        • Yeung D.K.T.
        • Patel H.R.H.
        • et al.
        Telementoring of surgeons: a systematic review.
        Surg Innov. 2019; 26: 95-111
        • Atallah S.
        Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): could this be the solution we have been searching for?.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21: 809-814
        • Moschovas M.C.
        • Bhat S.
        • Sandri M.
        • et al.
        Comparing the approach to radical prostatectomy using the multiport da Vinci Xi and da Vinci SP robots: a propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes.
        Eur Urol. 2021; 79: 393-404
        • Stevenson A.R.L.
        • Solomon M.J.
        • Brown C.S.B.
        • et al.
        Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 596-602
        • Fleshman J.
        • Branda M.E.
        • Sargent D.J.
        • et al.
        Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 589-595
        • Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group
        • Buunen M.
        • Veldkamp R.
        • et al.
        Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10 (x): 44-52
        • Jayne D.G.
        • Guillou P.J.
        • Thorpe H.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3061-3068
        • Grams J.
        • Tong W.
        • Greenstein A.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 1886-1891
        • Cirocchi R.
        • Trastulli S.
        • Farinella E.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy - systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surg Oncol. 2013; 22: 1-13
        • Lee K.H.
        • Lee M.R.
        • Pigazzi A.
        Robotic-assisted laparoscopic segmental resection with rectoanal anastomosis: a new approach for the management of complicated rectourethral fistula.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2013; 17: 585-587
        • Stein S.A.
        • Bergamaschi R.
        Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2013; 17: S35-S39
        • Feroci F.
        • Lenzi E.
        • Garzi A.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28: 1177-1186
        • Morpurgo E.
        • Contardo T.
        • Molaro R.
        • et al.
        Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013; 23: 414-417
        • Milone M.
        • Elmore U.
        • Di Salvo E.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.
        Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 2314-2320
        • Trastulli S.
        • Coratti A.
        • Guarino S.
        • et al.
        Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study.
        Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 1512-1521
        • Vignali A.
        • Bissolati M.
        • De Nardi P.
        • et al.
        Extracorporeal vs. Intracorporeal Ileocolic Stapled Anastomoses in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: An Interim Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016; 26: 343-348
        • van Oostendorp S.
        • Elfrink A.
        • Borstlap W.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 64-77
        • Cleary R.K.
        • Kassir A.
        • Johnson C.S.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: A multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0206277
        • Mari G.M.
        • Crippa J.
        • Costanzi A.T.M.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal Anastomosis Reduces Surgical Stress Response in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018; 28: 77-81
        • Allaix M.E.
        • Degiuli M.
        • Bonino M.A.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 270: 762-767
        • Emile S.H.
        • Elfeki H.
        • Shalaby M.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23: 1023-1035
        • Bollo J.
        • Turrado V.
        • Rabal A.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial).
        Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 364-372
        • Creavin B.
        • Balasubramanian I.
        • Common M.
        • et al.
        Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021; 36: 645-656
        • Veltcamp Helbach M.
        • Deijen C.L.
        • Velthuis S.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases.
        Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 464-470
        • de Lacy F.B.
        • van Laarhoven J.J.E.M.
        • Pena R.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 2442-2447
        • Perdawood S.K.
        • Kroeigaard J.
        • Eriksen M.
        • et al.
        Transanal total mesorectal excision: the Slagelse experience 2013–2019.
        Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 826-836
        • Klein M.F.
        • Seiersen M.
        • Buut O.
        • et al.
        Short-term outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in Denmark – a prospective multicentre study.
        Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23: 834-842
        • Caycedo-Marulanda A.
        • Lee L.
        • Chadi S.A.
        • et al.
        Association of transanal total mesorectal excision with local recurrence of rectal cancer.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e2036330
        • Alhanafy M.
        • Park S.S.
        • Park S.C.
        • et al.
        Early experience with transanal total mesorectal excision compared wi2th laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63: 1500-1510
        • Roodbeen S.X.
        • Penna M.
        • van Dieren S.
        • et al.
        Local recurrence and disease-free survival after transanal total mesorectal excision: Results from an international taTME registry.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19: 1232-1240