Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Surgical Oncology ClinicsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery.J Gastrointest Surg. 2021; 25: 983-990
- Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 2591-2601
- Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 2-9
- Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours.Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 1443-1450
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the padulap randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg. 2018; 268: 731-739
- Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4: 199-207
- Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020; 12: 1133-1145
- Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis from the U.S. neuroendocrine tumor study group.J Surg Oncol. 2019; 120: 231-240
- The role of laparoscopic surgery in localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021; 22: 27
- Outcomes of a multicenter training program in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2).Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 344-350
- Impact of a nationwide training program in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (LAELAPS).Ann Surg. 2016; 264: 754-762
- Outcomes of a multicenter training program in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3).Ann Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783
- Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report.J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3895-3902
- Standardization of surgical and pathologic variables is needed in multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z5031 trial.Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 337-344
- External retraction technique for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231: e8-e10
U.S. Food & Drug Administration website, Caution when using robotically-assisted surgical devices in women's health including mastectomy and other cancer-related surgeries: FDA safety communication. Access URL: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/update-caution-robotically-assisted-surgical-devices-mastectomy-fda-safety-communication, 2021, FDA.
- Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment.Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 1871-1878
- 500 Minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance.Ann Surg. 2021; 273: 966-972
- Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection.Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 3364-3372
- The miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection.Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 1-14
- Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: a position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).Surgery. 2018; 164: 1035-1048
- The impact of prehabilitation on patient outcomes in hepatobiliary, colorectal, and upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a PRISMA-accordant meta-analysis.Ann Surg. 2021; 274: 70-77
- Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer.HPB. 2016; 18: 170-176
- Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution.J Am Coll Surgeons. 2010; 211: 503-509
- Nationwide evaluation of patient selection for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy using american college of surgeons’ national quality improvement program.Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 1055-1061
- Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success.J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 182-195
- Preoperative methods to reduce liver volume in bariatric surgery: a systematic review.Obes Surg. 2016; 26: 251-256
- Totally replaced right hepatic artery in pancreaticoduodenectomy: is this anatomical condition a contraindication to minimally invasive surgery?.HPB. 2016; 18: 580-585
- Volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery.Br J Surg. 2016; 103: 136-143
- Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1128-1137
- The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: a Dutch population-based study.J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115: 738-745
- Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 20: 924-935
- Evaluation of a single surgeon’s learning curve of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk-adjusted cumulative summation analysis.Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 2870-2878
- Training and learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: from simulation to mastery.J Pancreatology. 2020; 3: 101-110
- Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve.JAMA Surg. 2015; 150: 416-422
- Evolution of a novel robotic training curriculum in a complex general surgical oncology fellowship.Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25: 3445-3452
- Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency.J Surg Educ. 2017; 74: 477-485
- Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy biotissue curriculum has validity and improves technical performance for surgical oncology fellows.J Surg Educ. 2017; 74: 1057-1065
- Formal robotic training reduces the learning curve of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.HPB. 2020; 22: S132
- Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review.Surgery. 2021; 170: 194-206
- The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre.HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17: 580-586
- Outcomes after distal pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: a retrospective comparison between minimally invasive and open approach using propensity score weighting.Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 165-173
- Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 10-17
- Improved Perioperative Outcomes With Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Results From a Population-Based Analysis.JAMA Surg. 2014; 149: 237-243
- Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 4: CD011391
- The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1159
- Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial.J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 233: 730-739.e9
- Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy (LAPOP): study protocol for a single center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2019; 20: 356
- Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial.Br J Surg. 2020; 107: 1281-1288
- Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2021; 22: 608
Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial for Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Body and Tail. clinicaltrials.gov; 2019. Access URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/sho the Pancreatic Body and Tail. clinicaltrials.gov; 2019. Access URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03957135.
- Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial).BMJ Open. 2021; 11: e047867
- Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.HPB (Oxford). 2019; 21: 1107-1118
- Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis.BMC Surg. 2017; 17: 105
- Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic tumors: a single surgeon’s experience of 228 consecutive cases.Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 2465-2473
- Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019; 404: 459-468
- Retropancreatic fascia is absent along the pancreas facing the superior mesenteric artery: a histological study using elderly donated cadavers.Surg Radiol Anat. 2013; 35: 403-410
- Iterative Changes in Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways and Accelerated Discharge After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05235-3
- One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 10-15
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC Gastroenterol. 2017; 17: 120
- Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e8619
- Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers.Ann Surg. 2019; 270: 1147-1155
- Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21: 1784-1792
- Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 2907-2913
- a multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.Ann Surg. 2016; 264: 640-649
- Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 2248-2254
- Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial | Trials | Full Text.(Available at:) (Accessed January 22, 2022)
- Blumgart method using LAPRA-TY clips facilitates pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99: e19474
- Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms.Br J Surg. 2015; 102: 1026-1036
- Ultrasound-guided robotic enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Surg Innov. 2019; 26: 37-45
- Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.Br J Surg. 2016; 103: 1358-1364
- Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate?.J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1692-1698
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
